Lost your password?
Don't have an account? Sign Up
Photo of John F. Grostic, D.C.
John F. Grostic, D.C.

Born:October 9, 1907 to Fred and Magdalina Grostic in Genoa Township, Michigan
Died:October 31, 1964 in Ann Arbor, Michigan
Married to:Grace Johnson on August 23, 1933 in Davenport, Iowa
Children:John David Grostic and Cheryl J. Grostic
High School:1927 St. Thomas High Schoo, Ann Arbor, Michigan
College:1933 Palmer School of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
Professional History:
Private practicein Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1933 until his death.
Clothing store:1927-1929 Holden’s Clothing store in Ypsilanti, Michigan

PHoto John D. Grostic, D.C
John D. Grostic, D.C.

Born:April 23, 1943 in Ann Arbor, Michigan
Died:June 27, 1995 in Atlanta, Georgia
Married to:Jill G. Gradshaw, D.C. on December 20, 1980 in Davenport, Iowa
Children:Richard Grostic and Christopher Grostic
High School:1961 St. Thomas High School in Ann Arbor, Michigan
College:Eastern Michigan University
1969 Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
Professional History:
Life College of Chiropractic in Marietta, Georgia. 1986 until his death.
Private practice1983–1986 in Orlando, Florida

1977–1983 Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa
Private practice1969–1977 in Ann Arbor, Michigan

The Origins Of The Grostic Procedure

By John D. Grostic, B.S., D.C as published in the:  International Review of Chiropractic – March 1978 (pages 33-35)

About the Author:

John D. Grostic, B.S., D.C., was a 1969 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic and was active in Grostic Chiropractic Presentations, Inc., from 1968 to 1976. The son of John F. Grostic, D.C., and Grace G. (Johnson) Grostic.

He was elected a Distinguished Fellow of the ICA. He was chairman of the Research Committee of the Michigan Chiropractic Council from 1971-73. He maintained a private practice in Ann Arbor, MI, from 1969 until his move to Davenport in1977.


The Grostic Procedure had its origins in the Palmer Specific Upper Cervical technique. It was one of several techniques that developed as a result of efforts to standardize chiropractic procedures and methods. Much of this effort to standardize the profession was the result of a group of chiropractors under the direction of Dr. B. J. Palmer. The group, known as the Palmer Standardized Chiropractic Council, founded by Roy G. Labachotte, D.C., provided a forum at which research and new ideas could be presented and exchanged.

Dr. John F. Grostic was one of the members of this organization. He, along with other chiropractors, would present research and ideas at the annual meeting of the Council. This annual meeting evolved into the Pre-Iyceum program where it continued to be the forum at which new ideas could be presented.

At these forums and in the “Bulletin” published monthly by the Council, Dr. John F. Grostic presented much of his research work. Since much of the material was being presented as it was being developed, the continuity in the presentations was lacking. Because of this, several chiropractors requested that Dr. Grostic assemble his research into a “package” that could then be presented to them at one time.

In 1946, Dr. Grostic presented the first seminar of the research work to a group of 14 doctors.

The Grostic Procedure is primarily a measurement system. The x-ray analysis is the real core of the procedure and is the one area that has remained constant over the last 30 years. During that time, the adjusting methods have changed several times in an effort to improve the effectiveness of the procedure. Since 1946, the adjustment has changed from a Palmer Toggle to what may still resemble a “Toggle,” but which is now a much shorter and lighter thrust. The contact point, the pisiform, usually travels less than one-fourth inch during the thrust. The result of this shortened thrust has been twofold. First, discomfort for the patient has for the most part been eliminated. Second, and more important, the atlas misalignment can be reduced more consistently and predictably.

The Grostic Procedure originated as a means of precisely measuring the misalignments of the cranium, atlas, and axis and this is still its prime function. It provides a means of evaluating various adjusting procedures. Because of this evaluating ability, new adjusting methods are continually being tested. When a particular change is proven to reduce misalignments better, it is incorporated into the adjusting aspect of the Grostic Procedure.

The procedure begins with the most basic chiropractic philosophy — that the human body has an inborn intelligence that controls function, growth and repair, and that this inborn intelligence must maintain a balanced and stable relationship between the body and its internal as well as itsexternal environment. It is the function of the nervous system to maintain this homeostasis.

To maintain this critical balance effectively, the nervous system must be continually informed not only of any changes in the external environment, but also of the current state of all internal systems. To accomplish this task, large amounts of data must be continually transmitted over the nerves to the brain where this information is integrated and acted upon.

If a response is required, it is transmitted over nerves to the appropriate structure, organ or cells. Any interference with the transmission of data or of the response can upset the delicate balance of homeostasis. The Grostic Procedure attempts to correct or reduce misalignments that have produced subluxations and their resulting nerve interference. The reduction of these subluxations allows the data and the response to again travel between the body and the central nervous system reestablishing homeostasis. This procedure provides a precise means of evaluating a misalignment of the upper cervical region of the spine. The misalignment can be a lateral or rotational misalignment of the atlas with respect to the skull or with respect to the axis or any combination of these misalignments. Of course, a misalignment does not always produce a subluxation and the presence of a subluxation must be determined by clinical evaluation of the patients. But, if misalignments are said to produce subluxations; one should be able to cite the mechanism by which this occurs.

Based on current knowledge, it would appear that there are at least four major mechanisms by which a misalignment of the upper cervical area of the spine can produce nerve interference and possible nerve dysfunction:

1. Because of trauma to the upper cervical area, “splinting” by the cervical muscles occurs to immobilize the area. This “splinting” can produce direct mechanical irritation to the nerves passing through these muscles, especially those that make up the brachial plexus.

2. Edema in the tissues surrounding the vertebrae can produce direct mechanical irritation to the nerves, arteries, and veins passing through the intervertebral foramen and also to the superior cervical ganglia.

3. Extreme rotatory subluxations have been shown to reduce or occlude the vertebral arteries, thus reducing blood flow to the brain and to the upper cervical cord. Rotatory subluxations between atlas and axis also cause the cervical cord and medulla to be displaced laterally away from the direction of rotation. This allows the tip of the dens to compress the medulla. (1).

4. Direct traction on the cord can be produced by the denticulate ligaments. This mechanism is the same mechanism that has been postulated as an explanation of the loss of lower extremity function in median herniation of the cervical discs (2). This traction on the spinal cord interferes with the normal function of the nerve tracts by at least two probable means:

    (a) Direct mechanical irritation of the nerves of the spinal cord.
    (b) Closing the small veins of the spinal cord, producing a stasis of blood in the cord (3) with a loss of nutrients necessary to carry on the very high energy reactions necessary for nerve conduction.

The Grostic Procedure did not dictate the “normal position” of the atlas. It instead provided a system of measurement that made possible the locating of that position of the atlas that resulted in the removal of abnormal clinical findings for the greatest period of time. This procedure no more dictates the “normal position” of atlas than physiology texts dictate the normal oral temperature to be 98.6 degrees.

The Procedure has made it possible to observe clinically the effect of various positions of the atlas on the findings of clinical tests. The outcome of this has been the observation that “normal,” while being somewhat variable, is not nearly as variable as one might think, and that the more closely the atlas is positioned toward the “normal,” the longer the patient’s clinical findings remain normal.

Several assumptions about the skull and cervical spine are made by this analysis system. The first assumption is that the skull on a nasium x-ray view is an incomplete ellipsoid. This ellipsoid has a major and minor axis and the major axis will be referred to as the vertical-central-skull-line. This line can be determined by using a skull measuring device, the cephlocentroscope, or by various mathematical methods of fitting an ellipse through man points. It is assumed that this vertical central-skull-line should be very close to vertical when the patients are free of subluxation and in the upright position.

The second major assumption made by this Procedure is that a line passing through the inferior-lateral attachment points, where the posterior arch of atlas joins the lateral masses, is representative of the plane of the atlas. It is assumed that if there is no laterality of atlas with respect to the skull, the line passing through the inferior-lateral attachment points will be nearly perpendicular to the vertical-central skull-line.

This system of measuring atlas laterality is similar to the other methods that have been used over the years. Except, where other methods have used the tops of the ocular orbits, the tips of the mastoids, the jugular processes, or the inferior tips of the condyles; the Grostic Procedure utilizes the skull itself. This method uses a statistical averaging of the many points that make up the side of the skull rather than choosing any one point, such as the tip of the condyle, as being representative of the entire skull.

The Grostic Procedure also assumes that the atlas line, drawn through the attachment points, should be very close to perpendicular to a line drawn through the center of the lower cervical spine. The lower cervical spine line is drawn from a point bisecting the distance between the lateral margins of the left and right zygapophyseal articular surfaces of the sixth or seventh cervical vertebra through a point midway between the center of the odontoid and the superior tip of the spinous process.

The Grostic Procedure makes a third assumption that the atlas viewed on the vertex or base posterior x-ray view should be positioned so that a line drawn through the centers of the foramen transversarium will be nearly perpendicular to a line longitudinally bisecting the skull.

The fourth major assumption is that the odontoid* and spinous process of C-2 should also be positioned at the center of the atlas as viewed on the nasium view.

*In about 20% of the cases, the odontoid is laterally displaced. In these cases, the center of the odontoid is not in the center of the axis. It is necessary to use the actual center of the axis when this condition is present. The center is found by bisecting the superior surface of axis.


1. Selecki, B. R.: The Effects of Rotation of the Atlas on the Axis: Experimental Work, Med. J. Aust. 1:1012-15,1969.
2. Kahn, E. A.: The Role of the Dentate Ligaments in Spinal Cord Compressions and the Syndromes of Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neurosurg 4:191, 1947.
3. Gillilan, L. A.: Veins of the Spinal Cord. Neurology 20:860-68, 1970

Skip to content